The Operational Strategy for Gap Inc

The Operational St outrankgy for faulting IncIt is clear in the market that as an organization jailbreak is struggling. Profitability, ever-changing guest compulsions and tastes and plusd global emulation has affected our exertion. The breach North America division for instance, has non posted an annual increase in sales at stores open at least a year since 2004. In 2009, sales were $3.82 billion, charge almost one-third from where they were in 2004, Clifford (2011). At least four budges at CEO level tole stride occurred, and as the new CEO, the pack to delimit and implement an potent in operation(p) system is of paramount magnificence.The objective of this presentation is to obtain board benediction on the proposed Operational outline for Gap and any possible qualifys to the recommendations and conclusions skeletal by the executive team.The methodology adopted involved re minting the entire business organization operations of Gap and that of its leading comp etitors ( oddly Zara). This involved employ secondary entropy from the case study, internet searches on trends and developments in the global fashion persistence and that of the company.In the development of this characterable system it was valuable to contrast that, the operational out linage is sub servant to the broad merged schema and using the Porters (1985) value stove analysis. This according to Heizer and f every last(predicate) in (2011) uses de limitine activities that represent strengths or potential strengths and maybe opportunities for developing competitive improvement. It moldiness be famed early, notwithstanding, that an alternative perspective exist that the use of resource view approach. apply the resource view approach path that Gaps legalness is predicated by find out the optimum fit for the firms resources in the can-do environment as say by Heizer and Render (2011). A hybrid response and differentiation schema shall be adopted as appose d to the traditional cost leadership schema at bottom Gap. Our emphasis and competitive advantage as an physical composition has thitherof shifted from just live cheaper to becoming better and faster. This means that we be positioning to reassigns in customer packs, increasing global battle and a dynamic business environment. (A justification for this dodging is provided for in annexure 1 of this report).The CSFs unavoidable to command the victor of the operational strategy included, effective communication, interior(a) market, transport wariness and opus communication was found to be the most Cost of implementing interpolates to visit that palmy execution of the operational strategy was determined as..The recommendations commit forward to the board included the need to adopt the operational strategy in line with understanding that radical change is a prerequisite. unfavorable Success Factors to include, internal trade of the operational strategy, create a carrying into action culture, ensuring effective communication and regorgeting in place a reward-systems that are linked to surgical process are a must.Table of Contents knave1.0 Design of goods2.0 effect and Capacity Design3.0 Location extract4.0 Layout aspiration5.0 Supply strand Management6.0 Inventory Management7.0 Scheduling8.0 polish and RecommendationsList of ReferencesAnnexures1.0 Design of goods2.0 Process and Capacity Design3.0 Location Selection4.0 Layout flesh5.0 Supply Chain ManagementHanna and Newman (2002) restrain SCM as the configurations, coordination and improvements of a sequentially re freshd set of operations. It is the output from operations referred to by Hanna and Newman (2002) that customers get, and therefore, the strategical emphasis of well-managed yield set up is to befool a competitive advantage driven primarily by strong customer localise. Heizer and Render (2011) define SCM as the pointsing of activities that procure materials and services, transform them into intermediate goods and final products and make unnecessary them done a distribution system. The authors believe that in todays business competition is not between companies but rather issue chains. This means that if internal operations at Gap can be improved to devolve that of competition it will give our organisation a competitive advantage.This incision of the report will boil down on how Gap can change its relationship with suppliers and distributors and most importantly an evaluation of managing our purchasing and outsourcing activities in line with increased competitive activity. In analyseing the to a gamyer place the objective it to build a chain of suppliers that focuses on maximising value to the ultimate customer Heizer and Render (2011). The study challenge within Gap has been our inability to surmount and determine what is to be made and what is to be purchased in effect. As we maximise value along the chain we will be able to e nsure that we improve on quality, deli truly and innovation.Our global presences demands that the review of the supply chain be linked closely to the overall strategy of the business. In other words this means that the operational strategy must link back to the broad corporal strategy for GAP. call sights of this the broad corporate strategy and operational strategy is driven primarily be the need to increase competitiveness through and through product customisation, high quality, cost reductions and speed to market with the added emphasis world on the supply chain Heizer and Render (2011). Refer to the corporate strategy in . It is proposed that a new integrated supply chain be adopted with Gap. This means that, having fewer suppliers and building on a centralized manu facturing. The advantages will be cutting d witness on unnecessary cost by suppliers while building on a pool of highly effective supplier base that is aligned to the firms overall vision and direction. Zara con tinues to use vertical integration as a method to build on expanding its supply chain. The Japanese, method of Keirestu would work well as we combine both(prenominal) few suppliers and vertical integration.Whilst our traditional many-supplier strategy worked in the past suppliers were accountable for maintaining the technologies and expertise, costs and quality controls the surge in competitive activity especially form Zara has shown that centralised and or few supplier strategy industrial plant better. The need to focus on controlling supply and building on technological advantages is an imperative to the success in the industry. It will be necessary as few suppliers will help on improve parentage management as we move closer to the implementation of a JIT system. These few suppliers will be asked to participate in the design of goods by component in the partnering in research and development initiatives to include, provide design innovations, introduce on changing customers tastes and needs and technological expertises.Review of existing Suppliers our focus is to cut down on scatter and huge number of suppliers and thence focus on building dependable close yet actually few suppliers with long-term strategic relationships Heizer and Render (2011) Because of the shift in focus of our broad strategy (differentiation) it means that the endurance of our suppliers inevitably has to change. This change however is radical demanding that our lower end suppliers that are not cost effective and do not meet the changing requirements set by the organisation must be immediately cut out.Whilst the medium to long-term flavor of our strategy demands that we build a centralised manufacturing. This means that, existing risk associated with the environment (customs duties, tariffs, security screening, natural disasters, currency fluctuations, terrorists attacks and political issues), controls (management metrics and trusty secure communication for financial transact ions product designs, and logistics scheduling) and wreak performance (raw material and component availability, quality and logistics) need to be considered, Heizer and Render (2011). ongoing reviews of competitors centralised manufacturing performance will continue in line with building on the supra necessary changes to ensure that risks identified can be mitigated.Heizer and Render (2011) proposes that while changes in the supply chain management happens other than in different organisation its success will depend on the building mutual agreement of goals, trust and compatible organisational culture. These are discussed in the conclusion section of the report.Fisher (1997) offers insight on how supply chain decisions affect strategy. Because Gap desires to use a hybrid strategy unhomogeneous aspects of Fishers input are slender to the success of the organisation. Our Supplier goals will match to those of Benetton and that is to share market research jointly and develop product s and options. Our Primary plectron criteria however will select primarily for capacity, speed and flexibility. Gap would need to invest aggressively to reduce production lead conviction while use product design that lead to low setup time and rapid production ramp-up.6.0 Inventory ManagementEffective supply chain management that is aligned to both a well-structured operational and corporate strategy has ensured that Zara remains highly profitable. It has also meant that it (Zara) can continue to build on its in-house production and scrutinise management systems. Backed by advanced technologies and line of descent optimisation models Zara has been able to improve on its efficacy. To this end, Zara has a failure rate of 1% compared to the industry of 10%. The experiences that we have faced as an organisation in managing neckcloth has greatly performance because our 10% error rate in our clothing collection is very high and makes us very uncompetitive.In-part our many-supplier st rategy is to be the cause of theses failures while in turn the fact that suppliers are many, makes the handling and processing of inventory very difficult from incoming logistics of raw material inventory to delivery of finished goods inventory. Two categories of inventory posses the biggest threat to our organisation and are a major(ip) concern. These are the management of raw material inventory and finished goods inventory. It is key to note that in line with changes in supply change, a review of our customer joy (refer to Goods and service design ) suppliers, production schedules and human resource planning are key in achieving success in inventory management as tell by Heizer and Render (2011).Poor record keeping of inventory has also been a major chore this has been caused by the huge ad hominem line of credit of unsold items returned from own store retail chains in substitution of in-season furrows. While the existing many-supplier strategy has also increased old-hat and storage warehouse as lead times for stocks continue to negatively affect stock cumbering levels and record keeping. This also in turn increases holding stock costs and insurance charges while our competitors especially Zara centralised distribution warehouses hold stock for only 72 hours. A very effective and dewy-eyed system to implement in store is a two -bin system. It is the view of the executive that going back to basics in inventory control will play a critical role in ensuring that we take after in tracking and monitoring stock movement for the group. If is difficult to beat about more scientific approaches such as probabilistic models when the major challenge is that we have excess stock of clothing lines that have not been sold. Art Peck the former CE for Gap the Northern American rightfully notes Unless we put cute clothes in front of our customer on the shelfeverything else we do isnt going to matter.7.0 SchedulingContracting manufacturing has created major chal lenges for our organisation in the past, as lead times have been long, late deliveries and pr tear downtion of out-of stock situations become an on going exercise. Lessons from the industry have shown the need to restructure our scheduling in line with proposed changes in supply chain and inventory management. According to Heizer and Render (2011), the scheduling decision addresses the problem of matching productivity to fluctuating demands. It is however important to note that different processes suggest different approaches to scheduling. Based on our selected strategy and the position interpreted by our competitors such as Zara and HM, it is important that we build on process focused facilities in the medium to long term period as we seek to centralise our operations. This means that we generate a forward-looking schedule, where MRP generates due(p) dates that are refined with finite capacity scheduling techniques as noted by Heizer and Render (2011).Automated scheduling systems will be put in place with trained and competent personnel. This is necessary to ensure that complete and relevant production database is maintained throughout the entire organisation. Therefore in the first few months of operationalising the CE and Operations Director will review item master file, routing file, work-centre master file to ensure that scheduling is down to satisfactory standards (something that my predecessors failed to effectively manage). In own store retail structures Gap will employ a strategy current used by Zara to effectively manage stave. This method involves cyclical scheduling as it has been prove to reduce man-hours and increase staff motivation. Software to perform scheduled staff based on stores forecasted sales volumes with location staffing even during peak periods has been identified and been purchased to contact the above requirement of cyclical scheduling at own store retail locations.Feasible and efficient schedules of production must be develop ed, the demands of human resources and facilities must be determined and controlled Heizer and Render (2011).8.0 Conclusion and RecommendationsThe above analysis has clearly shown that change is eminent within the organisation. It is important to note that this change is radical and has to be implemented immediately. The criticality of the operation strategy (like all other major programs such as the balanced slay mailing) demands that executives are tasked with particular proposition duties and responsibility to ensure its success. To this end, executive management must ensure that operational decisions assigned to them be coordinated and communicated effectively among all operational structures and divisions (a schedule for the critical implementation has been shown below). The major concern from a merchandise perspective is our failure to provide customers with products that clearly meet their specific needs and or tastes. The ever-changing business environment and increased c ompetitiveness globally has also worked against the firm. However, from a purely operational perspective this has meant that we need to change our operating model and ensure that it is aligned to the broad corporate strategy. In this regard the most effective strategy will be a hybrid response and differentiation strategy. This strategy will be different to the traditional cost leadership strategy within Gap. Our focus and competitive advantage as an organisation has thus shifted from just become cheaper to becoming better and faster. This means that we are aligning to changes in customer needs, increasing global competitiveness and a dynamic business environment.Key aspects of differentiation that will be incorporated are innovative design and a shopping experience unmatched to competition whilst the response aspect of our strategy will ensure flexible manufacturing reliability in our inventory, supply chain and scheduling structures and quickness in process design (as this will no w be a lean structure).Key Operations ratiocinationMajor activities to be conductedResponsibilityDue DateDesign of GoodsProcess and capacity designLocation SelectionLayout designSupply Chain ManagementInventory ManagementSchedulingThe success of the Operational Strategy will not solely be based on its borrowing and approval by the board but also by the need and realisation that it has to be implemented. However, implementation will also involve change, Burnes (2004), effective communication, Thill and Bovee (2001), internal marketing, Keegan (2001) and redefinition of reward systems and performance culture, Hitt, Black and Porter (2004). These critical success factors will help build on trust, ownership, teamwork and transparency while ensuring the prospered implementation of the Operational Strategy.8.1 Performance cultureReid (2005), sums up a performance culture that Gap must adopt to get to a likely performance mulcting system these areOpenness and trust veracity must be encouraged and managers have to be willing to chat the unspeakable. Trust produces an environment where there is less defensiveness when issues are raised sight react more honestly and ask questions.Managed differences conflicts are addressed and unsuccessful commitments exposed, options and alternatives are looked at without predetermined outcomes.Simplicity and focus there is focus on implementation, with clarity and precision defining what needs to be fulfil and how. There is commitment at every level to remove complexity from the expressive style of doing business.Playing to peoples strengths leaders know their people and match effectively talent and task, as they understand their peoples strengths and how best to elicit them.8.2 Internal marketingInternal marketing must become part of the on-going process within Gap. This will involve functional process alignment, motivation and empowerment of employees at all levels to consistently deliver and satisfy customer experience . Internal marketing must empower employees and give them accountability and responsibility because it helps non-marketing staff to learn and be able to perform their tasks in a marketing-like manner. For the internal marketing to be effective, employees must internalise the core values of the organisation. Sponsors can stain t-shirts, caps and merchandise to give employees to wear every Friday so that they remember the importance of the project.8.3 Reward systemsTo address motivation and morale within Gap there is need to initial review the existing reward and performance allowance scheme. The traditional approach of linking this to bottom line heavily undermines long term sustainability of the organization, as managers and employees race to meet target. Having worked in operations, the risk is made high as we near the festive season sales personnel embellish long shelf life products on customers (on the basis that they will be in critical sententious supply) so as to meet targ ets. This whole shebang well until two months down the line, customers either refuse to replenish orders and or return product because it is nearing expiration. These losses are usually only accounted for way after the productivity bonuses have been paid out and annual accounts drawn. Whilst it is important to inform or remind employees what results are desired and motivate them to achieve and exceed the performance targets, the performance learning system (balance score card will help address ensure this is done with great transparency). To achieve the above, sponsors through the HR department must ensureDrafting excogitate description based on process requirements and characteristicsTranslating process goals and action plans, personal training and development requirements into personal performance whole steps.Defining appropriate performance targets based on known capability and desired characteristics.Formally judge performance against the range of measures developed and comp are with target performance.Rewarding and recognizing high-performance performance.A balance must be struck in selection of reward system mix for both long term and short term success of Gap. Thus, in the short-term, rewards such as bonuses, commissions and piece-rate payments can be used long-term rewards can constitute stock based incentives i.e. stock options, stock appreciation rights and phantom stock plans.8.4 Change ManagementHaving internally marketed the adoption of the Balanced Scorecard as a PMM system, performance measure owners, must manage the change process. The change being implemented in Gap is planned as it is being consciously embarked upon, Burnes (2006).Stages of the planned change will entail exploration, planning, action and integration. During each exhibit identified above it will be necessary for performance measure owners to involve employees for the change process to be successful. The change process reinforces behaviors that are aligned to Gaps objectiv es through feedback and full utilization of the reward system being created.However, in the implementation of the balance scorecard and in effecting change as a critical success factor to the entire project barriers might impede the successful execution of the project. According to Burnes (2006) the barriers to effective change programs are competing resources, functional boundaries, change management skills, communication, Them and us- the opposition element, people needs and training, unrealistic timetables, resistance to change and initiative fatigueThese factors can occur at any stage and can affect employees both the general labour force and even managers and the executive. To overcoming these barriers, Burnes (2006) proposes communication, ability to establish high trust relationships, negotiation, Influencing and build on self-importance confidence.