Future of Food Essay Example for Free

Future of Food EssayIn the channeliseed couple of decades, the pabulums we deem to be essential or of the Earth be instead Genetically Engineered. The term Genetically Engineered does not mean that the broad(a) vegetable or provender is fake nevertheless rather means that there is at to the lowest degree one contagiousally modify ingredient in the food that is sold all over stores, which raises a outstanding health concern for umteen hoi polloi. In the feature production of the documentary known as The Future of Food looks at how modern day technology has changed the food we consume and the effects it burn down fill on our health. In watching this film about all the advancements that science has come to in the world with the food being eaten everyday, both the positive and controvert effects of all those technological changes, its unaccompanied right to think of the countries that bargonly have bounteous food in general or the people who ar losing their liveli hoods because of the advancements created by science in first world countries.A first world earth like the United States has not only a great amount but also stacks of variety of nutrition however, withal this is still not enough to satisfy such a flush nation because steps are still being taken to continue to improve nature. Projects were done that helped father corn in all kinds of different colors and creating larger than normal sized strawberries. A hesitation seems to arise, is all this technological advancement necessary?Are we as a society taking supernumerary measures to fix something that is natural and worked since the beginning of time? In the medical world, many health problems have been examined where food and nutrition were identified as partial contributors to the problem. This film helped in explaining how enzymes are used to knick corn desoxyribonucleic acid and how foreign deoxyribonucleic acid was then presented into the corn cell walls. Consuming the ge netically modified corn caused supersensitised reactions and stirred a health concern about labeling genetically modified foods.In my particular effect it should be the peoples right to know whether the food theyre ingesting has been altered genetically or tempered with from its natural state. Nevertheless, this does not belittle the question as to why it is necessity to alter the food in the first place. In install to formulate a ground based opinion I need to weigh the positives and negatives. Natural food always has the benefit of being natural, however, genetically engineered foods sometimes has the advantages of feeling more appealing, tasting better and/or having a longer lasting flavor.I have see this first hand I have grown a dis adjudicate to certain organic foods barely because they just didnt taste sensation nearly as good as those that are genetically engineered even though the organic foods were supposed to be cherubicer and of course natural. This certain tast e for food could just be that I got too used to the taste of all the preservatives that go into foods. Its interesting how I got used to chemically preserved foods and genetically engineered tastes that overtime became the good tasting ones while the healthier ones were spurned by my taste buds.Another benefit is that genetically engineered foods end up being cheaper because they have a greater resistance to environmental conditions that would normally spoil the unaltered form and are also do in quantities not given the same attention organic foods are given to be fresh and ripe. Being that they are made in greater beat, they are available for more people for cheaper prices, comely the food of choice. The question would be, are the quantities made and the decrease in prices good enough to outweigh the negative effects of genetically engineered food?Another point and question would be why do many countries still remain unfed and continue searching for methods to feed their fast g rowing peoples if these genetically engineered foods are produced in such a surplus manner? Keeping the advantages of genetically engineered foods in mind, there are definitely several noteworthy disadvantages too. An advantage was the surplus of food, however, how is it a benefit if such foods are harming the frame?Some would agree that it is better to feed and raise a healthy smaller sized population with natural, unaltered forms of food than to infect a large population and have them suffer from the repercussion caused by the food they had consumed. Also, most people that are not keeping up with this field of work do not know that there are these bodies that have consumed the modified foods for such prolonged time periods and have overtime probably developed immunity to the side effects the modifications can have. In these genetically engineered foods the DNA is altered, and just as changes in human DNA lead to disorders, consumption of foods with altered DNA may have the same fatal effects.Certain genetic modifications can even go as distant as cause cancers and brain and organ damage. A huge disadvantage that most people do not notice, especially those who live in urban areas, is that due to the production of the genetically altered foods a lot of farmers have been put out of jobs. These farmers are not needed as often any longer because more crops can be made for cheaper and therefore they no longer make as much money on each crop they plant and sow as they once did, as was shown in Central American countries.Now days, while technology could be helping the economy by diminish the price of foods for people, it is also harming people who depended on the unaltered food to bring them income. The U. S. economy and industry is choosing quantity over quality, which is not beneficial to our health but instead just our wallets. I believe that its not fair for people not to know what is in their foods and usually people dont try on food that can hurt them, therefore, it was crucial that the Genetically Engineered Right to Know act get passed.It would part with people to know what they are consuming from the labels on the foods and therefore prevented conditions that couldve risen from individuals allergic to a modified substance. The Department of Agriculture and the Food and Drug Administration is supposed to be on top of the foods produced and their effects. Nevertheless, it seems that genetically modified foods dont cause enough of a significant threat in order for them to take action and stop the advancement, rather than promote it and seek ways to improve it.What would bring this case to a flashing red alert? Though I admitted that genetically altered food does taste better, I still do not agree with the fact that I am consuming and enjoying the taste of unhealthy food. People often look for the most ripe fruits and healthy looking vegetables when they go shopping, but for a lot of produce these bigger fruits and vegetables end up being the modified ones. Though I personally have only been able to see the advantages of these foods, I realize that the disadvantages outweigh the benefits of having genetically modified foods.From a realistic point of view, being a student on a low figure it would be unpractical for me to purchase anything but the cheap genetically altered food. Looking even at the bigger picture, many individuals and families have the same outlook I do. Therefore, many people may be against the genetic modification of food, yet not much course of action will be taken. People are comfortable with their life styles, making the cases and effects of modified foods not seem like such a big deal. This shows that the wrong approach is probably being taken to bring this to significant awareness.To promote foods that are not going to be altered, there needs to be ways to produce the same great quantities and keep prices affordable under the economic conditions of the country and the budget of the av erage American Family. It was crucial to pass an act that will help identify the genetically engineered goods but still it is not sufficient enough to solve the issue at hand. This matter is truly a very controversial issue, containing both pros and cons therefore, we as a government and a knowledgeable society we need to take a stand and represent more ideas in to solving this domestic problem.