Facism in America :: essays research papers

Since mainstream left- enceinte media do non seriously ask this question, the analytic thinking of what has gone wrong and where we atomic number 18 heading has been mostly off-base. Investigation of the kinds of chthonian-handed, sorry tactics fascist regimes undertake to legitimize their agenda and accele crop the rate of change in their favor is dismissed as indulging in "conspiracy theory." Liberals insist that this regime must be treated under the rules of "politics as usual." But this doesnt consider that one election has already been stolen, and that Septembers repeat of irregularities in Florida was a clear warning that more much(prenominal) thuggery is on the way. If the "f" word is uttered, liberals are quick to none genuine obvious dissimilarities with previous variants of fascism and say that what is happening in America is not fascist. It took German justice minister Herta Daeubler-Gmelin to fill the comparison explicit (under gift Ame rican rules of political discourse, she has been duly sacked from her cabinet post) but at the liberal New York Times or The Nation, American writers dare not speak the truth. The masked assertion that we are immune to the virus ignores degrees of convergency and distinction based on the individual patients history. The Times and other liberal voices have been obsessed over the last form with the rise of nonage fascist parties in the Netherlands, France, and other European countries. They have questioned the tastefulness of new books and movies about Hitler, and again demonized such icons of Nazism as Leni Riefenstahl. Is this perhaps a switch of American anxiety onto the safer European scene, liberal intellectuals here not missing to confront the troubling truth? The pace of events in the last year has been almost as blindingly fast as it was after Hitlers Machtergreifung and the consolidation of fascist power in 1933. Speed stuns and silences.The proposed Iraqi adventure, whi ch is only the first ill-treat in a more ambitious militarist agenda, has been opposed by the most conservative warmongers of past administrations. If the test of any theory is its prophetical capacity, Bushs extreme risk-taking is better explained by the fascist model. Purely economic motives are a large part of the story, but there is a deeper parentage that exceeds such mundane rationales. Several of the apparent contradictions in Bushs governance make perfect sense if the fascist prism is applied, but not with the typical perspective. To pose the question doesnt mean that this is a completed project at any point, anything can happen to shift the course of history in a different direction.